Showing posts tagged “Nancy McFarlane”

Will Mayor Meeker try for a fifth term? His answer is …

Bob Geary · 26 Jan 2009, 2:30 PM · 1 Comment


We asked Mayor Charles Meeker, after his “State of the City” address today, whether he plans to seek a fifth term in the October elections. We’ve been hearing from people close to him that he doesn’t want to run again but hasn’t closed the door on it, at least with them.

Meeker’s answer to us: “It’s getting close to the time for me to leave.” To which he added that he hasn’t made a final decision yet — and shrugged. Right now, that’s his answer, he said.

The list of potential candidates should Meeker not run includes most of the current City Council members, though the likeliest ones all demur and/or express serious reservations about taking on a second full-time job — which pays all of $15,000 a year, by the way. From within the putative “Meeker Majority,” however, first-term Councilor Nancy McFarlane is the name most bruited about.

Raleigh, politics ,

Raleigh City Council II: Time enough for public comment on comp plan

Bob Geary · 22 Jan 2009, 6:49 PM · 3 Comments


It debuted in draft form on December 1 — online — which was at least a month behind schedule and hard against the holiday season. Printed copies of it are scarce to this day. The Raleigh Planning Department conducted three public briefings on it just last week, which was the first time that most of the folks who came — about 400 total — had ever seen the new Raleigh comprehensive plan.

And even there, what they saw was an outline and some broad-brush maps, not the thick document itself with its hundreds of pages of analysis, policy recommendations and minutely detailed land-use plan for the city.  Folks listened politely, asked a few questions, and when the briefings ended they had a chance to grab a department staffer and pose an additional question or two, which many did.

But four members of the Raleigh City Council think the public’s had far too little chance to digest the plan, let alone discuss it with their neighbors in small groups and compare notes, as the official public comment deadline of January 31 approaches. Nor have any of the city’s 18 Citizen Advisory Councils (CACs) taken up the comp-plan draft to this point — though in theory the CACs are the principal avenue for citizen participation in city government, especially planning.

So at this afternoon’s meeting, Councilors Thomas Crowder, Rodger Koopman, Nancy McFarlane and Russ Stephenson voted in favor of Crowder’s motion to extend the official comment period to the end of February. Four is not enough, however, on the eight-member council. The 4-4 deadlock meant the motion failed. Continue reading »

Raleigh, environment, politics , , , , , , , , ,

Raleigh City Council I: Less dog-tethering, please

Bob Geary · 22 Jan 2009, 5:25 PM · 3 Comments


At this afternoon’s meeting, City Attorney Tom McCormick was tasked with drafting an ordinance to limit dog-tethering based on laws already enacted by surrounding counties and towns. Councilor Nancy McFarlane said other jurisdictions have acted to ban or limit tethering, and it’s time Raleigh did too, “in light of the cruel practice it can be.” She asked McCormick to study what the other places have done and bring back a blend of the best elements.

Mayor Charles Meeker concurred, adding it was his sense that a majority of the Council is ready to move ahead as soon as McCormick puts a proposal in front of them. Meeker said a 4-6 month phase-in period would be appropriate after the ordinance is adopted. The N&O had some background this morning.

Read the Indy’s coverage of similar anti-tethering ordinances in Orange, where commissioners voted last fall to limit it. In Durham, an anti-tethering ordinance received a lot of attention last summer, and commissioners voted to approve it.

Durham County, Orange County, Raleigh, politics , ,

Cameron Village, Stanhope projects OK’d in Raleigh

Bob Geary · 8 Oct 2008, 9:19 AM · Comment


Neighbors disliked them, the relevant small-area plans didn’t allow them, but no problems — the Raleigh City Council said yes to big building projects in the Stanhope community and the Cameron Village shopping center. And that “Meeker Majority” supposedly plotting to cut them down to small-area plan size? Well, the four junior members split in half. Councilors Russ Stephenson and Thomas Crowder stood with the neighborhoods and voted no; Councilors Nancy McFarlane and Rodger Koopman, backed the developments — along with the senior member, Mayor Meeker himself. McFarlane said that, in tough economic times, she felt a “fiduciary responsibility” to greenlight new construction.

Raleigh, business, politics , , , , , ,

Battling over a Raleigh Planning Commission appointment

Bob Geary · 22 Sep 2008, 9:35 AM · Comment


How are the members of the Raleigh planning commission appointed? Well, 3 of the 11 are appointed by the county commissioners. The other eight are named, one at a time, by a majority (five votes) of the eight-member Raleigh City Council. They serve two-year terms, but the tradition is that, once on, they can serve up to three terms without any serious consideration of how they’re doing — or not doing — their jobs.  (Not doing? Well, some folks do call it the Raleigh Developers’ Commission.)

And no, the eight Council members do not each control one PC appointment — though that idea has been raised from time to time. To repeat, PC appointments are made by a majority of the Council.

Thus, for the last six or seven years, every member of the PC was named by a Council voting bloc consisting of  five conservative councilors who tended to green-light any and all development proposals regardless whether they made sense from a planning perspective. The five were Jessie Taliaferro, Joyce Kekas, James West, Philip Isley and Tommy Craven, plus a go-along Mayor Charles Meeker). Councilors Thomas Crowder and Russ Stephenson were shut out, as was Meeker himself to the extent he might have had nominees of his own in mind.

After the ‘07 elections, however, the conservative majority was out (Taliaferro and Craven defeated, Kekas retired) and a potentially progressive majority was in, with Crowder and Stephenson joined by new Councilors Nancy McFarlane and Rodger Koopman. Meeker would make five.

But on the first PC opening, Meeker isn’t making five. The proposed nomination of architect Heather Vance by the progressive four is currently stalled. Councilor West has his own candidate, Quince Fleming, and when the first vote was taken, it was 4 votes for Vance, 1 for Fleming, with Meeker, Isley and at-large member Mary-Ann Baldwin sitting on their hands. A blogger at NewRaleigh.com wants to know why Meeker doesn’t step up and make it five for Vance (and do read the comments–they’ll tell you a lot about the politics of this); for background on the players involved, a post at BelowtheBeltline.org is helpful.

Raleigh, politics , , , , , , ,