Showing posts tagged “Charles Meeker”

Czajkowski, Bell, Chilton, Meeker and Enloe file in CH, Durham, Carrboro, Raleigh for mayor

Lisa Sorg · 9 Jul 2009, 11:48 AM · Comment


Is that the sound of a cash register? First term Chapel Hill Town Councilman Matt Czajkowski has filed for mayor of Chapel Hill; like fellow mayoral candidate Augustus Cho, he has not opted to participate in the voter-owned election program, allowing them to raise large sums for their campaigns.

Czajkowski loaned himself more than $17,000 for his 2007 town council campaign.

Town Councilman Mark Kleinschmidt is also expected to run, but has yet to file.

Update at 5 p.m.: Matt Pohlman has filed for Chapel Hill Town Council. He has not enrolled in the voter-owned election program. Mark Chilton has filed for Carrboro mayor

In other Orange County filings, Gary Wallach and MaryAnne Gucciardi are running for Chapel Hill-Carrboro School Board.

In Durham, the Ward 2 race got more interesting as a third candidate, Sylvester Williams, a minister, is running against incumbent Howard Clement III and Libertarian Matt Drew.

Update at 5 p.m.: Incumbent Cora Cole-McFadden has filed for Durham City Council in Ward I.

And in the No Big Surprise department, incumbent Mayor Bill Bell is running for a fifth term, effectively dousing Mike Woodard’s mayoral aspirations this year. Woodard is running for re-election to City Council.

In Wake County, candidate filings for District 7 are popping up like mushrooms after a rain: Deborah Prickett and Jerry Ballan are running against Karen Simon.

Meanwhile Rodger Koopman is running for re-election in District B and Anthony Integlia is the sole person seeking the District C seat. 

Update at 5 p.m.: Chris Augustine has filed for Wake School Board District 2, bringing the candidate total in that race to four. In Cary, Jennifer Robinson will face Cynthia Sinkez in District A. 

In Raleigh, incumbent Mayor Charles Meeker filed for re-election; he’ll face Mark Enloe, who also filed today. Nancy MacFarlane is running for another term in Council District A; currently, the only district without a candidate is District E.

Chapel Hill, Durham, Raleigh, Wake County, politics , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Will Mayor Meeker try for a fifth term? His answer is …

Bob Geary · 26 Jan 2009, 2:30 PM · 1 Comment


We asked Mayor Charles Meeker, after his “State of the City” address today, whether he plans to seek a fifth term in the October elections. We’ve been hearing from people close to him that he doesn’t want to run again but hasn’t closed the door on it, at least with them.

Meeker’s answer to us: “It’s getting close to the time for me to leave.” To which he added that he hasn’t made a final decision yet — and shrugged. Right now, that’s his answer, he said.

The list of potential candidates should Meeker not run includes most of the current City Council members, though the likeliest ones all demur and/or express serious reservations about taking on a second full-time job — which pays all of $15,000 a year, by the way. From within the putative “Meeker Majority,” however, first-term Councilor Nancy McFarlane is the name most bruited about.

Raleigh, politics ,

Raleigh City Council II: Time enough for public comment on comp plan

Bob Geary · 22 Jan 2009, 6:49 PM · 3 Comments


It debuted in draft form on December 1 — online — which was at least a month behind schedule and hard against the holiday season. Printed copies of it are scarce to this day. The Raleigh Planning Department conducted three public briefings on it just last week, which was the first time that most of the folks who came — about 400 total — had ever seen the new Raleigh comprehensive plan.

And even there, what they saw was an outline and some broad-brush maps, not the thick document itself with its hundreds of pages of analysis, policy recommendations and minutely detailed land-use plan for the city.  Folks listened politely, asked a few questions, and when the briefings ended they had a chance to grab a department staffer and pose an additional question or two, which many did.

But four members of the Raleigh City Council think the public’s had far too little chance to digest the plan, let alone discuss it with their neighbors in small groups and compare notes, as the official public comment deadline of January 31 approaches. Nor have any of the city’s 18 Citizen Advisory Councils (CACs) taken up the comp-plan draft to this point — though in theory the CACs are the principal avenue for citizen participation in city government, especially planning.

So at this afternoon’s meeting, Councilors Thomas Crowder, Rodger Koopman, Nancy McFarlane and Russ Stephenson voted in favor of Crowder’s motion to extend the official comment period to the end of February. Four is not enough, however, on the eight-member council. The 4-4 deadlock meant the motion failed. Continue reading »

Raleigh, environment, politics , , , , , , , , ,

Raleigh City Council I: Less dog-tethering, please

Bob Geary · 22 Jan 2009, 5:25 PM · 3 Comments


At this afternoon’s meeting, City Attorney Tom McCormick was tasked with drafting an ordinance to limit dog-tethering based on laws already enacted by surrounding counties and towns. Councilor Nancy McFarlane said other jurisdictions have acted to ban or limit tethering, and it’s time Raleigh did too, “in light of the cruel practice it can be.” She asked McCormick to study what the other places have done and bring back a blend of the best elements.

Mayor Charles Meeker concurred, adding it was his sense that a majority of the Council is ready to move ahead as soon as McCormick puts a proposal in front of them. Meeker said a 4-6 month phase-in period would be appropriate after the ordinance is adopted. The N&O had some background this morning.

Read the Indy’s coverage of similar anti-tethering ordinances in Orange, where commissioners voted last fall to limit it. In Durham, an anti-tethering ordinance received a lot of attention last summer, and commissioners voted to approve it.

Durham County, Orange County, Raleigh, politics , ,

Raleigh comp plan: More time needed for review, Rindge says

Bob Geary · 11 Dec 2008, 3:42 PM · 1 Comment


Fresh off her Citizen Award from the Indy, WakeUP Wake County chair Karen Rindge asks the Raleigh City Council to extend the period of public review for the new comprehensive plan. The giant plan, printed copies of which are in very limited supply, was unveiled only a week ago, and the public review period is so far scheduled to end on Jan. 31. With the holidays and various inaugurations in between, it’s not enough time, Rindge said in a letter today to Mayor Charles Meeker and his seven council mates:

WakeUP Wake County would like to commend Mitch Silver, Ken Bowers and the
Raleigh planning staff for their tremendous work in producing the large
draft comprehensive plan for our city’s future.

Given the importance of this document, we believe that the public should be
given more time to review the more than 300 pages of the draft plan. A
January 31 deadline does not permit citizen groups, made up of volunteers,
the time to read, discuss and provide useful comments. The holidays,
inauguration activities and more will prevent most people from really
examining it during this timeframe. WakeUP respectfully requests that you
move the deadline for public comment to the end of February, 2009.

Every public library is supposed to have a copy of the plan. Otherwise, it’s available online on the city’s website — if you know where to look.

Raleigh, environment, politics ,

Cameron Village, Stanhope projects OK’d in Raleigh

Bob Geary · 8 Oct 2008, 9:19 AM · Comment


Neighbors disliked them, the relevant small-area plans didn’t allow them, but no problems — the Raleigh City Council said yes to big building projects in the Stanhope community and the Cameron Village shopping center. And that “Meeker Majority” supposedly plotting to cut them down to small-area plan size? Well, the four junior members split in half. Councilors Russ Stephenson and Thomas Crowder stood with the neighborhoods and voted no; Councilors Nancy McFarlane and Rodger Koopman, backed the developments — along with the senior member, Mayor Meeker himself. McFarlane said that, in tough economic times, she felt a “fiduciary responsibility” to greenlight new construction.

Raleigh, business, politics , , , , , ,

Battling over a Raleigh Planning Commission appointment

Bob Geary · 22 Sep 2008, 9:35 AM · Comment


How are the members of the Raleigh planning commission appointed? Well, 3 of the 11 are appointed by the county commissioners. The other eight are named, one at a time, by a majority (five votes) of the eight-member Raleigh City Council. They serve two-year terms, but the tradition is that, once on, they can serve up to three terms without any serious consideration of how they’re doing — or not doing — their jobs.  (Not doing? Well, some folks do call it the Raleigh Developers’ Commission.)

And no, the eight Council members do not each control one PC appointment — though that idea has been raised from time to time. To repeat, PC appointments are made by a majority of the Council.

Thus, for the last six or seven years, every member of the PC was named by a Council voting bloc consisting of  five conservative councilors who tended to green-light any and all development proposals regardless whether they made sense from a planning perspective. The five were Jessie Taliaferro, Joyce Kekas, James West, Philip Isley and Tommy Craven, plus a go-along Mayor Charles Meeker). Councilors Thomas Crowder and Russ Stephenson were shut out, as was Meeker himself to the extent he might have had nominees of his own in mind.

After the ‘07 elections, however, the conservative majority was out (Taliaferro and Craven defeated, Kekas retired) and a potentially progressive majority was in, with Crowder and Stephenson joined by new Councilors Nancy McFarlane and Rodger Koopman. Meeker would make five.

But on the first PC opening, Meeker isn’t making five. The proposed nomination of architect Heather Vance by the progressive four is currently stalled. Councilor West has his own candidate, Quince Fleming, and when the first vote was taken, it was 4 votes for Vance, 1 for Fleming, with Meeker, Isley and at-large member Mary-Ann Baldwin sitting on their hands. A blogger at NewRaleigh.com wants to know why Meeker doesn’t step up and make it five for Vance (and do read the comments–they’ll tell you a lot about the politics of this); for background on the players involved, a post at BelowtheBeltline.org is helpful.

Raleigh, politics , , , , , , ,